Customer-centric Prioritization Frameworks: Level-up from MoSCoW and RICE

I’ve done the hard work for you. I have pulled out the 18 customer-focused methods from the 101 overall. We talk a lot about being customer-focused. What do you say we make it official?

Jordan Lamborn
Product Coalition
Published in
7 min readFeb 10, 2021

--

nappy.co

I have looked into at least 107 prioritization frameworks so far. Keep in mind that pretty much any scoring framework or matrix can be steered towards the customer with a small tweak or two (changing “business impact” to “customer impact,” for example). However, here I have teased out the 18 of 107 that are explicitly customer focused.

Below is the full list of customer-focused prioritization frameworks. From there, scroll to find more information.

  • Monster score
  • Gusto quadrant
  • DIE score
  • How many, How often matrix
  • BACER score
  • IDEA/E scoring
  • Value Mapping
  • BUC score
  • Nine-box Updated
  • Product Manager Triangle score
  • 5 Pillar framework
  • Three Feature Buckets
  • EFQ
  • 11 Questions score
  • Opportunity Score
  • Disruption vs Visibility Bug Prioritization
  • CUP method
  • Decision Diamond

Monster Score

Monster score formula
UX Collective

Monster is right. It’s like RICE on steroids. It has almost everything that I could think of that I would want. It doesn’t have strategic alignment included (one of my favorites), but it does have one significant upgrade from RICECustomer Impact (separately from business impact).

Read more: UX Collective

Gusto

--

--

Product Manager @ Slice. Curious. Learning, read/write on product management. ex-Expedia. Product School. PSPO I. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordanlamborn/